Funding for Boise State University’s science research building survived a close vote Tuesday.
On a 10-9 vote, the Joint Finance-Appropriations Committee approved a budget that partially funds the Boise State project.
The funding is found in a larger budget for the Permanent Building Fund, which covers state and campus capital projects.
One line item in the Permanent Building Fund budget covers $72.9 million in higher ed projects. But JFAC members disagreed about how to spend the money.
One version of the budget contained no money for Boise State. Rep. James Petzke, R-Meridian, proposed a budget that included $17.9 million for the Boise State science research building, which would provide teaching and research labs for chemistry and biology.
Petzke said he tried to carve up the $72.9 million based on enrollment at Idaho’s two- and four-year schools.
“I get a little heartburn when we begin picking favorites among our higher education institutions,” Petzke said.
Supporting Petzke, Sen. Rick Just, D-Boise, castigated budget-writers for trying to zero out Boise State, saying it continues a pattern of “disrespecting” the state’s largest university.
Sen. Van Burtenshaw, R-Terreton, said the committee needs to give schools the money they need to finish a building project — and if the state carves up the money based on enrollment, smaller schools such as Lewis-Clark State College will never get enough money to complete a project.
Even at $72.9 million, JFAC’s budget pares back Gov. Brad Little’s request. He had recommended $109.9 million for higher ed projects, including $30 million for the Boise State project.
In a statement Tuesday, Boise State lauded JFAC for funding the “much-needed” research building.
“We are committed to working with lawmakers to answer any questions that may arise as this funding bill works its way to the governor’s desk,” spokesman Mike Sharp said.
But if Tuesday’s vote is any indication, the Permanent Building Fund budget could face a bumpy ride.
Petzke’s motion to fund the Boise State project passed by a single vote, but only after Sen. Julie VanOrden, R-Pingree, changed her vote from no to yes. And the Permanent Building Fund budget still must pass both houses.
Another Idaho Launch bill heads to Senate floor
The debate over Idaho Launch — Gov. Brad Little’s postsecondary incentives bill — will now shift to the Senate floor.
A divided Senate Commerce and Human Resources Committee passed a bill that would tweak the controversial program, and a House-passed Idaho Launch bill.
The Idaho Launch “trailer bill” makes a series of changes to the proposed program:
It would allow high school graduates to receive up to $8,000 to pursue in-demand careers, down from an $8,500 cap, and students would have to pay at least 20% of their cost.
High school graduates could use Idaho Launch to attend community college, take career-technical education classes or pursue workforce training. Under the new bill, students wouldn’t be allowed to use Idaho Launch for four-year school, but the Opportunity Scholarship for four-year school would remain intact.
Changes to the proposal aside, the debate was more or less a repeat from previous hearings.
Supporters such as College of Western Idaho President Gordon Jones said the incentives would unlock many in-demand careers for students who can’t afford the training.
The Idaho Freedom Foundation, a hardline lobbying group, said the trailer bill did nothing to fix the program’s basic flaws. “We still think it has the same aroma of cronyism,” said Fred Birnbaum of the Freedom Foundation.
Committee members wrestled with whether to kill the trailer bill, Senate Bill 1167, or to send it on to the floor, where a predecessor awaits. Last week, the committee sent that bill, House Bill 24, to the floor for possible amendments.
On a 5-4 vote, the committee sent SB 1167 to the floor, with a recommendation to pass it. This means the Senate could vote on both bills separately, or work pieces of SB 1167 into an amended HB 24.
Here’s how the committee voted on SB 1167:
Yes: Kevin Cook, R-Idaho Falls; Jim Guthrie, R-McCammon; Linda Wright Hartgen, R-Twin Falls; James Ruchti, D-Pocatello; Janie Ward-Engelking, D-Boise.
No: Dan Foreman, R-Moscow; Todd Lakey, R-Nampa; Brian Lenney, R-Nampa; Doug Ricks, R-Rexburg.
Budget covering costs from U of I slayings heads to Little’s desk
The Senate OK’d a $1 million budget bill to cover some costs stemming from the Nov. 13 slayings of four University of Idaho students.
House Bill 222 is designed to offset some of the U of I’s costs — for increased campus security, expanded counseling and a vigil honoring murder victims Ethan Chapin, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle and Madison Mogen.
“I want there to be a message that’s clear from this body, that we support the University of Idaho,” said Senate Majority Leader Kelly Anthon, R-Burley, urging colleagues to support the bill.
The Senate’s message was not unanimous. Eight Republicans voted against the $1 million bill: Dan Foreman of Moscow; Cindy Carlson of Riggins; Phil Hart of Kellogg; Scott Herndon of Sagle; Brian Lenney of Nampa; Tammy Nichols of Middleton; Chris Trakel of Caldwell; and Glenneda Zuiderfeld of Twin Falls.
The budget bill now goes to Gov. Brad Little, who initially proposed the line item.
JFAC approves a scaled-back charter commission budget
It was a case of message received in JFAC Tuesday morning, as budget-writers downsized their spending plan for the Idaho Public Charter School Commission.
The committee approved a $728,900 budget for the commission, which oversees the bulk of the state’s charter schools.
Missing in this budget is a $96,800-a-year program manager’s position.
The House voted down the charter commission budget Thursday — and opponents said the additional position would simply ramp up regulation of the state’s charter schools.
The rewritten budget, minus the new program manager, passed JFAC unanimously. It now must pass the House and Senate.
You may also be interested in